Publicly reported physician ratings: here to stay but not yet ready for prime time.

نویسنده

  • Diane Shannon
چکیده

Public reporting of physician performance—whether user-generated physician rating websites or metrics-driven, scientifically based performance reports—is a reality of health care today and is increasingly tied to high-stakes outcomes, including reimbursement and compensation. With the rise of the consumerism movement, more and more patients are proactive in choosing their providers and are increasingly turning to the Internet to make their selection and to voice their opinions about providers with whom they have interacted. In the past, patients’ conversations about their physicians largely consisted of informal discussions with friends, family members and acquaintances that extended no further than the two or three individuals involved. With the Internet, these conversations now have rapid and widespread distribution via online physician rating websites. And they can affect physicians’ reputations. The stakes associated with metrics-driven physician performance assessments are also greater than in the past. As the cornerstone of the delivery system, physicians exert significant influence through clinical decision-making on the quality and cost of health care.1 Many stakeholders are looking to individual physician performance ratings with the goal of standardizing care with best practice guidelines and thus improving quality and cost efficiency. Governmental agencies, payers, advocacy groups and consumers are more frequently demanding transparency in physician performance than in the past, as a means for improving the quality and cost efficiency of health care. Payers are using rating systems to identify physicians deemed to provide care of higher quality and greater cost efficiency and are offering patients benefit plans that incentivize the selection of higher-ranking physicians. As the outcomes of physician ratings are increasingly tied to reimbursement and compensation, the validity, reliability and relevance of these systems becomes crucially important. It is important for physician leaders to understand the current state of physician ratings systems, the likely future trends, the potential utility and negative consequences of ratings systems, and how to best guide their organizations to make the most of the opportunities afforded by these systems and minimize the potential risks.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Physician Rating Websites: an Analysis of Physician Evaluation and Physician Perception

Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate current physician ratings websites (PRWs) to determine whichfactors correlated to higher physician scores and evaluate physician perspective of PRWs.Methods: This study evaluated two popular websites, Healthgrades.com and Vitals.com, to gather information onpracticing physician members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society database. A surv...

متن کامل

Have Non-physician Clinicians Come to Stay?; Comment on “Non-physician Clinicians in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Evolving Role of Physicians”

A decade ago, sub-Saharan Africa accounted for 24% of the global disease burden but was served by only 4% of the global health workforce. The chronic shortage of medical doctors has led other health professionals especially nurses to perform the role of healthcare providers. These health workers have been variously named clinical officers, health officers, physician assistants, nurse practition...

متن کامل

Evidence of weak conscious experiences in the exclusion task

Exclusion tasks have been proposed as objective measures of unconscious perception as they do not depend upon subjective ratings. In exclusion tasks, participants have to complete a task without using a previously presented prime. Use of the prime is taken as evidence for unconscious processing in the absence of awareness, yet it may also simply indicate that participants have weak experiences ...

متن کامل

Nurses’ Perception of Nurse-physician Communication: A Questionnaire-based Study in Iran

Background and Objectives: Effective nurse-physician communication is essential for provision of high quality clinical care. Research into nurse-physician communication is a new field in Iran, and the importance of the issue calls for further investigation. In response to this necessity, this study aimed to assess nurses’ perception of nurse-physician communication in teaching hospitals affilia...

متن کامل

Self – Others Rating Discrepancy of Task and Contextual Performance

This research compared ratings of task performance and contextual performance from three different sources: self, peer, and supervisor. Participants were service industry employees in the service industries in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. A Sample of 146 employees and 40 supervisors   from the service industries provided ratings of task performance and contextual performance. The results indicated th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Physician executive

دوره 39 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013